In 'Three Strikes', Daniel Wodak (Penn) argues that in the face of sufficiently unjust law, judges ought - collectively - to disobey. The Surrey Centre for Law
The Surrey Centre for Law and Philosophy invites you to an online seminar to be delivered by Daniel Wodak (Penn). No pre-reading required.
Abstract: Legal ethics is dominated by discussions of what lawyers should do. But there’s a longstanding, unresolved debate between proponents and opponents of judicial obedience (judicial fidelity to unjust laws). I outline the trilemma in the debate so far: judges can either resign (which is dismissed as futile), obey (which makes them complicit), or engage in lawless judging (which undermines rule of law values). I then have two main goals. First, to argue that systematic injustices undermine the main justifications that are offered for judicial obedience and lawless judging. And second, to offer a novel way out of the trilemma: by diagnosing the issue as a collective action problem, we can see the appeal of collective action as a solution. The main upshot will be that judges should collectively engage in political strikes.
The Zoom meeting will begin at 16:00 (UK time) on 16 Sept and you can access it at that time by clicking HERE.
(If you have any problems registering through Eventbrite, please simply click the link above at the time of the event.)
(Wednesday) 4:00 pm - 6:00 pm